Numerical scores are kind of ass
Hello dear readers,
I have decided to post an update on this
blog, after writing two posts for the first time in almost three years. Well,
some first words: life has really gotten in the way. Listening to music
used to be an hobby for me, something that I considered constructive and
that brought me a lot of joy. Well, then graduate school happened.
Crazy to think I am actually really close to being an actual scientist!
But Here We Are: The Album I am currently listening to. |
That said, I came across this blog once more. Gave this once passion project a through read. With my newly found super analytic skills (acquired through years of hard studying data analysis and looking at dinosaur bones) I identified a problem: I don't really enjoy numerical scores. They don't correctly reflect my appreciation for the music.
So I am stealing Jeremy Jahns' idea: a more abstract, "end user" approach to rating.
Here's what that will look like:
- Dogshit: The lowest rating. This album sucks, and I don't want to listen to it again.
- You will forget this album: A forgettable album. It is bland, and does not leave much of an impression.
- A good time if you are drunk: One of those "so bad it is good" type of media.
- Stream it: A rather good album, but not one worth owning. There are better choices to expand you collection out there!
- Buy it on vinyl: A great album, worth owning and taking for a spin every once in a while!
- Trve and kvlt: This is one of those albums. One that defined the way I consume and experience music. One of those albums that will stand the test of time. All in all, a great album.
Comments
Post a Comment